ABEL
CARLEVARO AND THE HISTORY OF GUITAR
HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH HEITOR VILLA-LOBOS
ALFREDO
ESCANDE
The german version of this article has been published in December 2003
by
GITARRE AKTUELL (Germany)
.jpg)
December 12, 1943 - Petropolis - Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Abel Carlevaro is standing behind Heitor Villa-Lobos and Guido Santorsola.
Two days before, at Teatro Municipal de Rio, Carlevaro had premiered Preludes 3 and 4, Villa-Lobos being present.
He did it again -the morning in which this picture was taken- at Teatro Dom Pedro, in Petropolis.
Ladies sitting down: at the left Sarah Bourdillon de Santorsola, and at the right Arminda Villa-Lobos. Beside her, Fanny Ingold.
This picture has been published by Museu Villa-Lobos (but wrongly stating the date as 1935, and without giving any names of the "group of friends" of Villa-Lobos). The author received a copy of this picture from Mtro. Frédéric Zigante, and thanks him for his kind generosity.
Introduction
The topic of Abel Carlevaro’s
relationship with Heitor Villa-Lobos and his work,
deserved many
articles and mentions in books and other publications with little documentary
support and many speculations up to now. Although many of his former students
have published interviews and others have included references to the topic
through outstanding works (many university graduation thesis, for example),
it has been put in
doubt overtly
in
some specialised magazines when the first meeting between both musicians really happened, as well as the
truth of the fact
that Carlevaro did play in
public and recorded for the first time some
preludes.
At the same time other
information was not only contradicted but also attributed to
self-publicity purposes.
Today, having a precise and wealthy documentary material, which allows supporting the statements of Maestro Carlevaro and others that I will make here, and as an advance of a deeper and extensive study I plan to publish as a book, I want to quote passages from long conversations which I had with him between 1974 and 2001, firstly as his student, then as a collaborator in each of the books he wrote (not all of them have yet been published). I have selected for this article the passages of these dialogues which let rebuild the story about his relationship with Villa-Lobos, and I have complemented them with those elements which arose from my own investigations about the topic and they are still –all of them- properly documented. In any other case based on my own judgement only, I will denote it explicitly.
Not all the
items introduced in these conversations will result new for
those who already know about these topics. My friends and colleagues Oliver
Primus[1],Janez
Gregoric[2]
and Rüdiger Scherping[3],
among others, have already published excellent works quoting similar statements
from Carlevaro, and he himself has also referred to some of these facts in his
own books.
I want to express my gratitude to Mrs. Vani Leal de Carlevaro, who has
gently allowed me to have access to the personal files of the Maestro.
Conversations
-
Maestro Carlevaro, how and when did you meet Villa-Lobos?
- I met him
in Montevideo, where he had come to conduct some of his works. During his stay
here, some people from “Centro Guitarrístico del Uruguay”, and also Andrés
Segovia (with whom I was studying in
that time he was living in Montevideo) asked me to give a concert in Villa-Lobos'
honour[4].
It was for me an occasion of great responsibility, and Villa-Lobos (accompanied
by Arminda), Segovia and Francisco Curt Lange were in front of me in the first
row of the audience. I know there is a photograph showing all of them, but –
because of shyness or just because I did not realise at that moment the
importance of the event – I did not manage to participate in the group
photograph. Today I regret it!
Once I had finished
my short concert, Villa Lobos came to greet me, congratulating me
and giving some indications about his Chôros Nº1, which I had included in my
program. I should add that this was his only work for guitar which I knew up to
that moment. After some short comments, he made me some observations of approval
about my performance and he expressed his wish that I would go to Rio to work
together on some pieces he had composed for the instrument. That caused me a
great happiness and at the same time curiosity to know those other works.
-
How was your 1943 trip to Brazil finally accomplished?
-
I did not rest, searching any appropriate occasion, which would allow me to go
to Rio, so that I could fulfil with Villa-Lobos’ invitation. It was precisely
Dr. Francisco Curt Lange, who was the director of “Instituto Latinoamericano
de Musicología” at that moment the
person who organised for me a series of concerts around Brazil, including two
presentations in “Teatro Municipal de Rio”: one playing alone[5],
and the other one with the town Orchestra, giving the Brazil première of
the Concertino for guitar and orchestra whose author, Guido Santorsola had
dedicated to me.[6]
-
Was it the first time you went on tour outside Uruguay?
- That was my
first tour outside Uruguay: first I made a performance in Porto Alegre[7],
then in Sao Paulo and finally I arrived in Rio, where I could study with
Maestro Villa-Lobos. He was present in two of my concerts in Rio, and few
days later I was working with him, first on his preludes and then on his famous
studies for guitar.
-
During that tour around Brazil in 1943, did you play in public any of
Villa-Lobos works, which you had been studying with him?
- I stayed
several months in Brazil in that tour around many cities. Among other concerts,
as I have already told you, I gave two in which Villa-Lobos was present: one at
“Teatro Municipal de Rio” and the other at “Teatro Dom Pedro”, an old
theatre from the colonial period in Petropolis city, near Rio. In the first one I played the Preludes 3 and 4, which I believe was the first public
presentation of those works[8]. For the second one,
Villa-Lobos and Arminda came with me from Rio[9].
That was in December 1943, the 10th and 12th respectively.
It was in that time, as I have already said, that Villa-Lobos gave me the
manuscripts of the Studies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10, and Prelude Nº1[10].
-
Did Villa-Lobos tell you that they were written by him?
- He never
told me that, and I did not think at that moment that it would have any
importance. What was important for me was the fact that he gave them to me and
for that reason I keep them with great affection. I cannot make a calligraphic
study, and besides it is possible that he would have asked someone to help him
making some copies. At that moment, of course, it was not so easy to have
copies of documents as it is today.
-
Were those studies already published? How did you get to know them?
- They had
not been published yet[11],
I wanted to study them, Villa-Lobos wanted me to play them, and he gave me the
possibility by lending me the manuscripts and later giving them to me. But I
want to tell you something important. Because of Villa-Lobos' invitation I went
to his house to listen to his Studies for the first time. There he introduced me
to a great Spanish pianist, his friend, Tomás Terán, who had been living in
Rio for a few years. He invited him to play his twelve studies for guitar at the
piano for me. That was the unusual way I knew for the first time the studies for guitar, played at
the piano by Terán.
-
I guess it was a very special class for you....
- It was a
wonderful class! Villa-Lobos was telling me all the details concerning to each
of the studies, while Terán was playing them at the piano. I keep that peculiar
lesson in my mind as something very special. It made me understand how those
studies must be transmitted, with all their beauty, far from the original instrument, and
from an abstract point of view; how to introduce the different problems that the
author himself showed me at the precise moment, during the performance.
-
When did you start working on Villa-Lobos studies?
- While I was
staying in Rio and when I was working with him at “Conservatorio del Canto
Orfeónico”, as I told you, Villa-Lobos gave me the manuscripts of the studies
and some preludes so that I started reading them. Of course the first one was
the Nº1, the study of arpeggios. After one week it seemed to me that my work
was ready to be presented, so I took it to play it at his
presence. When I finished playing I was flattered by his congratulations for my
performance, telling me that he was impressed by the way I played his
study. And he told me that the way I had perceived it, had coincided – luckily
– with his original idea. And I was even happier when he asked me for a pencil
and wrote on the manuscript he had given to me, the indication “Allegro non
troppo”. “I like it in this way” he told me, and at that moment he said
that the beauty of that study was in the clearness of each note and in the
different sonorities presented in each time, having the repetition the effect of
an echo. How excited I felt when he awarded me by giving me as a present those manuscripts that
he had lent me to study! After that very important day for me, I continued
working on the other studies under his tutoring, receiving the contribution of
his advice, always precise and clear. It was in those days, on 23rd
December 1943, that he autographed for me one of his photographs, which I still keep
within the souvenirs from that period[12].
-
Is it true that you recorded works of Villa-Lobos in Rio de Janeiro?
- It is true.
He took me to the governmental radio station (I do not remember its exact name), which
belonged to the Ministry of Education in Brazil in order to record the preludes.
I never knew what happened with those recordings[13]
because when the tour ended I came back to Uruguay, and I did not care about
that event anymore. But maybe, sometimes they were broadcasted by the Brazilian
radio and I never knew about that.
-
How do you assess that period of work with Villa-Lobos?
- That moment
was very important because I started to get in contact with a very special
person, because of his quality as a human being and as a musician. I had studied
the rules of harmony and counterpoint and I tried to respect carefully all of
their precepts. And when I met him I found myself in front of a character who
was breaking all
those rules. It called my attention how he faced music so differently than the
way I had understood it in my first works. In front of that procedure I had to
re-make my scholastic world of discipline and respect for all that was learnt. I understood, throughout his teaching, that man can break
the past and start a
new way. That world Villa-Lobos showed me was a new one, very good for
me because - almost without realising it - I started to create my own rules which, although
they did not exist at that moment, developed as time went on. This gave me as a
result a wider vision of the music world.
-
Do you consider that Villa-Lobos influenced your way of composing?
- I think
that in a certain way my last works are a consequence of those pieces of advice
from this great Maestro. I have always been deeply grateful to him. For this reason and
the admiration that I feel to his work, I wrote the series of five studies
“Homenaje a Villa-Lobos”
-
Could you make a biographical sketch and describe Villa-Lobos as a person and as
a musician?
- Of course.
First, I should say that Villa-Lobos is unmistakable because of his
overflowing and persevering character. Because of his will and idealism he could
get free from the academic influences and produce his own music in which his
strong and original personality emerges, as well as the sound reality of the Brazilian people.
His was a strong and charismatic personality, with a mischievous and
witty spirit. I heard him saying: “I strongly believe in what I feel. I hate
imitation as well as the musical routine”.
As
a conclusion
I hope that what was
previously written and the documents shown here (just a part of the plentiful
material in the documentary files
on which I have based my work) will put an end to
the scepticism that some people keep about these facts, which today are part of
the history of guitar. Its protagonists do not live anymore, but their works
keep
standing on their own. In spite of the fact that I plan to
deepen into these
subjects
in a book (in progress) about Abel Carlevaro’s life and work, I
will still express in this occasion some of my own considerations.
First, I believe there is no doubt that – although young, because he
was almost 27 years old – Carlevaro could not be considered as an
inexperienced guitarist when he travelled to Brazil and played in front of
Villa-Lobos the première of his Preludes 3 and 4 (on December 10th
1943 in Rio de Janeiro). From that first contact on 25th
October 1940, great important events happened in his career. He obtained
outstanding recognition and prestige from them, particularly his concert on 12th November 1942 in Montevideo, which was publicly presented by
Segovia[14]. Another important event in this sense was his
premiering of Guido Santorsola’s “Concertino para guitarra y orquesta”
dedicated to him, also in the most important
theatre in Montevideo.(The same in which Segovia had premiered
“Concerto in Re” by Castelnuovo-Tedesco and
“Concierto del Sur” by Ponce). I have more than ten
copies of articles from 1942 and 1943 in the most important publications in
Montevideo. From all of them it is possible to conclude that at that moment
Carlevaro was already considered the most serious guitarist of the country and
the most connected with the world of the new musical creation by the musical
circles and the critics.
However, Villa-Lobos was not the only Brazilian musician who noticed the
musical quality of the guitarist, Abel Carlevaro. The composer M. Camargo
Guarnieri was also impressed when listening to him and after one of the
concerts of that tour at the end of 1943 and beginning of 1944, he congratulated
and told him that he wanted to compose a work for him. Camargo’s “Ponteio”
was born in that way and dedicated to Abel Carlevaro, who performed it for the
first time at Estudio Auditorio del SODRE on 10th
August 1944, shortly after he arrived from Brazil.
As we are talking about premières, I want to say that I have had in my own hands the programme of a performance by Carlevaro at the Montevideo University Hall, in a cultural soirée devoted to Mario Castelnuovo-Tedesco’s work. There it is evident that on 3rd September1942 Carlevaro performed in first audition for Uruguay three pieces from the Italian composer: Variazioni attraverso i secoli, Tarantella and Aranci in fiore. The first two were dedicated to Segovia who, as it is known, was living in Montevideo at that period and in 1939 had performed for the first time the Concerto in Re by Castelnuovo himself. Not only was Segovia in favour of that première in the city where he was living, but most probably did also encourage it.
As a consequence, there is no reason to doubt about the fact that Villa-Lobos supported the first public presentation (and, as we also know, the recording) by Carlevaro of some of his works . Not only because of his significance –as we have already demonstrated- as a guitarist and musician (something that –without reading any chronicle- the artist Villa-Lobos had already examined closely) but also due to the particular harshness of the relationship between Segovia and the composer. He told Carlevaro that in Paris, 1929, Segovia expressed that his studies were “unplayable”. I do not have the documentation that supports it[15] but however, according to Carlevaro, this had produced the first distance between both personalities. In October 1940, some days before Carlevaro’s concert in homage to the Brazilian composer, Segovia received Villa-Lobos in his house and felt again the same rejection for his music, this time his preludes. In his letter to Manuel M. Ponce, on 22nd of that month, he told him that the preludes, as well as the previous twelve “Estudos”, were most of them of no use, boring, and also that one of them, played by Villa-Lobos himself, almost made him want to laugh[16].
Therefore, it is reasonable that finally the preludes have not appeared dedicated to Segovia but to Villa-Lobos’ second partner, Arminda Neves d’Almeida (under this name in the first publication of numbers 3 and 4, in 1941, and then as “Mindinha”, her familiar nickname, in Max Eschig issues). Besides, he had decided not to wait until Segovia played them one day. I believe that Segovia’s double attitude attracts the attention: on one hand in his letter to Ponce, on the other hand the autograph in the minute book from “Centro Guitarrístico del Uruguay” dated the day of Carlevaro’s concert (document 1). This double attitude appears clearly if the letter is compared with Segovia’s words in the Prologue of Max Eschig edition of the 12 Studies, in January 1953. I doubt that an experienced and witty man, like Villa-Lobos surely was, failed to realise that duality.
Concerning the scores from which Carlevaro
played Preludes 3 and 4 in Rio de Janeiro in front of Villa-Lobos, we should say that
they correspond to the “Suplemento musical” published by the magazine “Música Viva” in
January 1941[17].
I have –as I already said- a photocopy of that publication of the preludes,
which Maestro Carlevaro gave me
years ago. It includes the fingering from Carlevaro’s handwriting and the first
page of each of the preludes exactly coincides with the reproduced facsimile
which appears in the magazine mentioned in the previous footnote. As Mr Ophee[18]
shows, Francisco Curt Lange was a member of the editorial team of the magazine.
Therefore it is natural that he would have given Carlevaro the
issue we are speaking about.[19]
It was him who arranged the first meeting between both musicians, introduced them to each
other, and organised Carlevaro’s first visit to Brazil so that
–besides giving concerts – he
could study Villa-Lobos’ works with the composer himself.
To end up these considerations I believe it is worth to transcribe some
parts of a review written for one of the concerts in Brazil (in “O Diario”
from Belo Horizonte, on 28th December
1943)[20].
I think that they clearly show the musical level already reached by Abel Carlevaro and the impression he
made in the Brazil of Villa-Lobos: